M
Matthew da Silva
Here we go again...
Bob, please explain why my, in reality explicit and not purported, 'penchant' (which means an inclination towards), is a drawback, since you
present not one reason to support your statement. Same as the last person, in fact...
Furthermore, I fail to see why anonymity would reduce a feeling of satisfaction or pride. On the contrary, it may increase those feelings. In
my post there are several arguments, but none of them have attracted the direct attention of any person. All points to the contrary so far are
unsubstantiated opinion. Such argument as this, as I said before, would carry no water in an anonymous volunteer environment.
Notwithstanding recognition, I would question whether it is at all important to have one's name published on standards. It would seem to me that the goal was the creation of standards that are good and useful rather than the publishing of the names of participants. First one should ask What is the goal? Then the solution will more rapidly appear. The pleasures of participation and other intangibles would serve to reward participants.
Why is it irrelevant that there be anonymity? What is the reason? Several people have claimed such a position but none have put up a single reason why it should not work. It have demonstrated many.
Rgds,
Matthew Yamatake Tokyo
Bob, please explain why my, in reality explicit and not purported, 'penchant' (which means an inclination towards), is a drawback, since you
present not one reason to support your statement. Same as the last person, in fact...
Furthermore, I fail to see why anonymity would reduce a feeling of satisfaction or pride. On the contrary, it may increase those feelings. In
my post there are several arguments, but none of them have attracted the direct attention of any person. All points to the contrary so far are
unsubstantiated opinion. Such argument as this, as I said before, would carry no water in an anonymous volunteer environment.
Notwithstanding recognition, I would question whether it is at all important to have one's name published on standards. It would seem to me that the goal was the creation of standards that are good and useful rather than the publishing of the names of participants. First one should ask What is the goal? Then the solution will more rapidly appear. The pleasures of participation and other intangibles would serve to reward participants.
Why is it irrelevant that there be anonymity? What is the reason? Several people have claimed such a position but none have put up a single reason why it should not work. It have demonstrated many.
Rgds,
Matthew Yamatake Tokyo